From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 13:08:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] qcow1: Validate image size (CVE-2014-0223)

A huge image size could cause s->l1_size to overflow. Make sure that
images never require a L1 table larger than what fits in s->l1_size.

This cannot only cause unbounded allocations, but also the allocation of
a too small L1 table, resulting in out-of-bounds array accesses (both
reads and writes).

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 46485de0cb357b57373e1ca895adedf1f3ed46ec)

Conflicts:
	tests/qemu-iotests/092
	tests/qemu-iotests/092.out
---
 block/qcow.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/qcow.c b/block/qcow.c
index bdd2003..4946bbf 100644
--- a/block/qcow.c
+++ b/block/qcow.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ typedef struct BDRVQcowState {
     int cluster_sectors;
     int l2_bits;
     int l2_size;
-    int l1_size;
+    unsigned int l1_size;
     uint64_t cluster_offset_mask;
     uint64_t l1_table_offset;
     uint64_t *l1_table;
@@ -162,7 +162,19 @@ static int qcow_open(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict *options, int flags)
 
     /* read the level 1 table */
     shift = s->cluster_bits + s->l2_bits;
-    s->l1_size = (header.size + (1LL << shift) - 1) >> shift;
+    if (header.size > UINT64_MAX - (1LL << shift)) {
+        error_report("Image too large");
+        ret = -EINVAL;
+        goto fail;
+    } else {
+        uint64_t l1_size = (header.size + (1LL << shift) - 1) >> shift;
+        if (l1_size > INT_MAX / sizeof(uint64_t)) {
+            error_report("Image too large");
+            ret = -EINVAL;
+            goto fail;
+        }
+        s->l1_size = l1_size;
+    }
 
     s->l1_table_offset = header.l1_table_offset;
     s->l1_table = g_malloc(s->l1_size * sizeof(uint64_t));