Sophie

Sophie

distrib > Scientific%20Linux > 5x > x86_64 > by-pkgid > 27922b4260f65d317aabda37e42bbbff > files > 2489

kernel-2.6.18-238.el5.src.rpm

From: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:10:25 -0400
Subject: [net] bonding: fix updating of speed/duplex changes
Message-id: <20100507141025.GD23636@gospo.rdu.redhat.com>
Patchwork-id: 24899
O-Subject: [PATCH RHEL5.6] bonding: Fix updating of speed/duplex changes
Bugzilla: 567604
RH-Acked-by: John Linville <linville@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>

Reports indicated that 802.3ad mode bonding was broken on RHEL5.4 and
later.  After I started looking at it I realized we got bit by an
upstream regression, so I backported the upstream fix:

	commit 17d04500e2528217de5fe967599f98ee84348a9c
	Author: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
	Date:   Wed Mar 18 18:38:25 2009 -0700

	    bonding: Fix updating of speed/duplex changes

		This patch corrects an omission from the following commit:

	    commit f0c76d61779b153dbfb955db3f144c62d02173c2
	    Author: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
	    Date:   Wed Jul 2 18:21:58 2008 -0700

		bonding: refactor mii monitor

		The un-refactored code checked the link speed and duplex of
	    every slave on every pass; the refactored code did not do so.

		The 802.3ad and balance-alb/tlb modes utilize the speed and
	    duplex information, and require it to be kept up to date.  This patch
	    adds a notifier check to perform the appropriate updating when the slave
	    device speed changes.

Reporter has verified this will resolve RHBZ 567604


diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index d4d7815..018e61e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3604,11 +3604,29 @@ static int bond_slave_netdev_event(unsigned long event, struct net_device *slave
 		}
 		break;
 	case NETDEV_CHANGE:
-		/*
-		 * TODO: is this what we get if somebody
-		 * sets up a hierarchical bond, then rmmod's
-		 * one of the slave bonding devices?
-		 */
+		if ((bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_8023AD) ||
+		    (bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_TLB) ||
+		    (bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_ALB)) {
+			struct slave *slave;
+
+			slave = bond_get_slave_by_dev(bond, slave_dev);
+			if (slave) {
+				u16 old_speed = slave->speed;
+				u16 old_duplex = slave->duplex;
+
+				bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
+
+				if ((bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_TLB) ||
+				    (bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_ALB))
+					break;
+
+				if (old_speed != slave->speed)
+					bond_3ad_adapter_speed_changed(slave);
+				if (old_duplex != slave->duplex)
+					bond_3ad_adapter_duplex_changed(slave);
+			}
+		}
+
 		break;
 	case NETDEV_DOWN:
 		/*