From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Subject: [RHEL5.2 PATCH] - jbd: wait for already submitted t_sync_datalist buffer to complete Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:42:34 -0500 Bugzilla: 250537 Message-Id: <46D2FEFA.20102@redhat.com> Changelog: [fs] jbd: wait for t_sync_datalist buffer to complete This is for bug Bug 250537: [PATCH] jbd: wait for already submitted t_sync_datalist buffer to complete This change catches buffers which are locked but not dirty, i.e. just submitted for IO, in the journal_submit_data_buffers() path so that they are waited on just like buffers which were actually submitted from that function. The change has been upstream since late last year. Thanks, -Eric ================================== X-Git-Tag: v2.6.20-rc2~15 X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=6f5a9da1af5a8c286575c30c2706dc1fbef9164b [PATCH] jbd: wait for already submitted t_sync_datalist buffer to complete In the current jbd code, if a buffer on BJ_SyncData list is dirty and not locked, the buffer is refiled to BJ_Locked list, submitted to the IO and waited for IO completion. But the fsstress test showed the case that when a buffer was already submitted to the IO just before the buffer_dirty(bh) check, the buffer was not waited for IO completion. Following patch solves this problem. If it is assumed that a buffer is submitted to the IO before the buffer_dirty(bh) check and still being written to disk, this buffer is refiled to BJ_Locked list. Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz> Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> --- Index: linux-2.6.18-24.el5/fs/jbd/commit.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.18-24.el5.orig/fs/jbd/commit.c +++ linux-2.6.18-24.el5/fs/jbd/commit.c @@ -248,8 +248,12 @@ write_out_data: bufs = 0; goto write_out_data; } - } - else { + } else if (!locked && buffer_locked(bh)) { + __journal_file_buffer(jh, commit_transaction, + BJ_Locked); + jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh); + put_bh(bh); + } else { BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "writeout complete: unfile"); __journal_unfile_buffer(jh); jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);